When ATI launched its Radeon Pro in September , it performed about the same as the MX, but had crucial advantages with better single-texturing performance and proper support of DirectX 8 shaders. The MX, which had been discontinued by this point, was never replaced. Retrieved January 2, Between capability and competence , Tech Report, April 29, Comparison of Nvidia graphics processing units. It also owed some of its design heritage to Nvidia’s high-end CAD products, and in performance-critical non-game applications it was remarkably effective.
|Date Added:||6 July 2013|
|File Size:||16.4 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Nvidia English translation “. Retrieved from ” https: Despite harsh criticism by gaming enthusiasts, xm4000 GeForce4 MX was a market success. ATI’s Radeon Pro graphics card: Bringing mobile gaming to new heights”.
MSI NVIDIA GeForce MX 4000 (MX4000T128) 128MB DDR SDRAM AGP 4x/8x Graphics adapter
All three families were announced in early ; members within each family were differentiated by core and memory gorce speeds. GeForce 2 4 MX. It outperformed the Mobility Radeon by a large margin, as well as being Nvidia’s first DirectX 8 laptop graphics solution.
This family is a derivative of the GeForce4 MX family, produced for gfrce laptop market. Though its lineage was of the past-generation GeForce 2, the GeForce4 MX did incorporate bandwidth and fill rate-saving techniques, dual-monitor support, and a multi-sampling anti-aliasing unit from the Ti series; the improved bit DDR memory controller was crucial to solving the bandwidth limitations that plagued the GeForce and GeForce 2 lines.
This caused problems for notebook manufacturers, especially with regards to battery life.
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
The GeForce 4 Ti enjoyed considerable ,x4000 compared to its higher-clocked peers. Retrieved January 2, In practice its main competitors were chipset-integrated graphics solutions, such as Intel’s G and Nvidia’s own nForce 2, but its main advantage over those was multiple-monitor support; Intel’s solutions did not have this at all, and the nForce 2’s multi-monitor support was much inferior to what the MX series offered.
Despite its name, the short-lived Go is not part of this lineup, it was instead derived from the Ti line. However, because the GPU was not designed for the mobile space, it had thermal output similar to mx4000 desktop part. Tesla GeForce 8 9 Kepler GeForce At half the cost of thethe remained the best balance between price and performance until the launch of the ATI Radeon Pro at the end of Views Read Edit View history.
Although the was initially supposed to be part of the launch of the GeForce4 line, Nvidia had delayed its release mmx4000 sell off the soon-to-be discontinued GeForce 3 chips.
In consequence, Nvidia rolled out a slightly cheaper model: When ATI launched its Radeon Pro in Septemberit performed about the same as the MX, but had crucial advantages with better single-texturing performance and proper support of DirectX 8 shaders.
Between capability and competenceTech Report, April 29, This page was last edited on 10 Octoberat It was very similar to its predecessor; the main gforrce were higher core and memory clock rates, a revised memory controller known as Lightspeed Memory Architecture IIupdated pixel shaders with new instructions for Direct3D 8.
Comparison of Nvidia graphics processing units.
NVIDIA GeForce4 MX Specs | TechPowerUp GPU Database
Firstly, the Ti was perceived as being not good enough for those who wanted top performance who preferred the Tinor those who wanted good value for money who typically chose the Ticausing the Ti to be a pointless middle ground of the two.
Many criticized the GeForce 4 MX name as a misleading marketing ploy since it was less advanced than the preceding GeForce 3.
One step forward, two steps back? There were 3 initial models: DirectX 9 goes mainstreamTech Report, November 27, This tactic didn’t work however, for two reasons.
It also owed some of its design heritage to Nvidia’s high-end CAD products, and in performance-critical non-game applications it was remarkably effective. Retrieved April 12, GeForce Series Video cards Computer-related introductions in Nvidia attempted legal action against a version mx0400 Omega Drivers that included the Nvidia logo.